Choosing a vector database is one of the most consequential infrastructure decisions for any AI application. Pinecone offers managed simplicity. Weaviate provides flexibility and hybrid search. PGVector lets you skip an entirely new database by adding vector support to PostgreSQL. Each choice shapes your architecture, operational burden, and costs for years. This comparison breaks down the real trade-offs so you can make an informed decision.
Quick Decision Guide
- Choose Pinecone if you want zero operational overhead, have a serverless budget, and need strong multi-tenant support.
- Choose Weaviate if you need hybrid search (vector + keyword), want to self-host, or need advanced filtering and data modeling.
- Choose PGVector if you already use PostgreSQL, have a small-to-medium dataset (under 5M vectors), and want to keep your stack simple.
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Feature |
Pinecone |
Weaviate |
PGVector |
| Type | Managed SaaS | Self-hosted or Cloud | PostgreSQL Extension |
| Deployment | Serverless | Docker / K8s / Cloud | Any PG host |
| Hybrid Search | No (vector only) | Yes (BM25 + vector) | Via full-text search |
| Metadata Filtering | Strong | Strong | SQL WHERE clauses |
| Multi-Tenancy | Namespaces (built-in) | Multi-tenant module | Schema separation |
| Max Vectors | Billions (serverless) | Billions (clustered) | ~5-10M practical |
| Query Latency (1M vectors) | ~30-50ms | ~50-80ms | ~100-200ms |
| Built-in Embeddings | Inference API | Yes (vectorizer modules) | No |
| Backups & Recovery | Managed | You manage | PG backup tools |
| Pricing Model | Per query + storage | Infrastructure costs | PG hosting costs |
| Best For | SaaS, startups | Complex search apps | Small-to-medium RAG |
Pinecone: The Managed Approach
Strengths
- Zero operations: No servers, no clusters, no index tuning. You get an API endpoint and start upserting vectors.
- Serverless scaling: Scales from zero to billions of vectors without capacity planning. You pay for what you use.
- Multi-tenancy: Namespaces provide clean tenant isolation. Covered in depth in our multi-tenant RAG guide.
- Consistent latency: P99 latency stays under 100ms even at scale. There is no latency degradation as your index grows.
Weaknesses
- No hybrid search: Vector-only. If you need keyword matching alongside semantic search, you need a separate system.
- Vendor lock-in: Proprietary API. Migrating away requires re-indexing everything.
- Cost at scale: Per-query pricing can become expensive for high-throughput applications.
Weaviate: The Flexible Approach
Strengths
- Hybrid search: Combines BM25 keyword search with vector search. Best of both worlds for applications where exact term matching matters, like modernizing ElasticSearch workflows.
- Built-in vectorizer: Modules for OpenAI, Cohere, HuggingFace. You can store text and let Weaviate handle embedding generation.
- GraphQL API: Powerful query language for complex filtering, aggregations, and cross-references between objects.
- Self-hostable: Full control over your data and infrastructure. Container-based deployment on Kubernetes.
Weaknesses
- Operational complexity: Self-hosting means managing clusters, backups, upgrades, and scaling yourself.
- Learning curve: The schema-based data model and GraphQL API take time to learn compared to simple key-value APIs.
- Resource hungry: Requires more RAM per vector than Pinecone due to the HNSW index residing fully in memory.
PGVector: The Pragmatic Approach
Strengths
- No new infrastructure: If you already use PostgreSQL, you already have your vector database. Install the extension and go.
- SQL integration: Join vector search results with your relational data. "Find similar products that are also in stock and under $50" in a single query.
- Ecosystem: Every PostgreSQL tool, backup system, and monitoring solution works with PGVector.
- Cost: No additional database costs beyond your existing PostgreSQL hosting.
Weaknesses
- Performance ceiling: Query latency degrades significantly beyond 5M vectors. Not suitable for large-scale embeddings.
- No built-in sharding: Horizontal scaling is complex. You need PostgreSQL-level sharding solutions (Citus, etc.).
- Index build time: Building HNSW indexes on large datasets takes hours and locks the table.
How to Choose: Decision Framework
Go with Pinecone if...
You are building a SaaS product, don't want to manage infrastructure, need strong multi-tenancy, and your primary use case is semantic similarity search (RAG, recommendation, classification).
Go with Weaviate if...
You need hybrid search (keyword + vector), want self-hosting for data sovereignty, have complex data relationships, or you're building search-heavy applications.
Go with PGVector if...
You already run PostgreSQL, your vector dataset is under 5M rows, you need SQL joins between vector results and relational data, or you are prototyping and want minimal infrastructure.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I switch vector databases later?
Yes, but it is not free. You need to re-embed your documents (unless you stored the original embeddings) and re-index everything. Design your retrieval layer with an abstraction so the vector DB is swappable without rewriting your application logic.
What about Chroma, Milvus, or Qdrant?
Chroma is excellent for prototyping and local development. Milvus is strong for on-premise deployments at massive scale. Qdrant offers a good balance of features and self-hosting simplicity. This comparison focused on the three most commonly chosen for production SaaS and enterprise workloads.
How do I optimize retrieval quality regardless of which DB I use?
The database handles storage and search. Retrieval quality depends on your embedding model, chunking strategy, and query pipeline. See our guides on fixing RAG failures and optimizing RAG at scale.
Pick the Right Infrastructure
We help teams choose and implement the right vector database for their scale, budget, and performance requirements.
Get Infrastructure Advice